Debate over competition format at Brier sparks talk of potential relegation
The recent Brier competition format has sparked discussions, receiving both criticism and praise, particularly due to the inclusion of an 18-team lineup at the Prospera Place in Kelowna, B.C. Despite the playoffs’ lineup featuring six commendable teams, critics have pointed out various disparities within the current system, advocating for a potential return to a relegation system.
One vocal proponent of reinstating relegation into the competition format is six-time Brier champion Brad Gushue. He expressed a desire to revisit the relegation system that was utilized from 2015 to 2017, suggesting that such a format could ensure that the “best option” is selected, enabling full round-robin play inclusion and enhancing the competitive spirit of the games.
The relegation stage that Curling Canada previously employed involved a round-robin match among the four lowest-seeded provinces and territories, with the winner advancing to the main draw. Curling Canada had referred to this stage as a “pre-qualifying” round. Notably, Kerry Galusha, a prominent figure in Northwest Territories women’s curling, shared her insights on the matter via an online platform, highlighting how the relegation process had motivated teams to push themselves to excel and improve.
Over the years, Curling Canada’s approach to the Brier format has evolved. The competition transitioned to a 16-team format in 2018 for both the Brier and the Scotties Tournament of Hearts, with direct entries offered to the defending champion, provincial, and territorial victors, along with a wild-card team. Amidst the shifting landscape of the competition, concerns have emerged regarding disparities in rankings and tie-breaking procedures, as demonstrated by the predicament that Northern Ontario’s John Epping faced, leading to his exclusion from the playoffs.
Critics have highlighted the intensity and competitive edge that the current format instills in the early stages of the competition. However, calls for reform have been raised, spotlighting the challenges faced by lesser-funded or less-experienced teams pitted against established powerhouses. Despite the complexities associated with devising a perfect competition format, stakeholders are cognizant of the need to strike a balance between fostering competitiveness and ensuring inclusivity within the event.
While debates surrounding the competition format continue to intensify, Curling Canada affirmed its commitment to upholding the current format through the next season. Should any modifications be deemed necessary, they would be implemented in the subsequent Olympic cycle. Notably, the 2025 Brier champion, Brad Jacobs, overcame the challenges presented by the competition format, demonstrating resilience and skill throughout the playoffs to secure his victory.
As the landscape of curling competitions evolves, discussions concerning the format and structure of major events like the Brier remain critical to ensuring the sport’s growth and appeal. By considering feedback from stakeholders and evaluating the efficacy of existing formats, organizers can enhance the competition experience for both participants and spectators, fostering a more engaging and inclusive curling landscape.